Capitalism and Consecration
Most Mormons in this country vote conservative and there is a good reason for the harmony between these two stances. I’m not saying that these good reasons are the actual reasons why most Mormons vote the way they do. I can’t help but agree with the many criticisms and suspicions from left-leaning Mormons bring against this strong correlation. While I do not wish to reduce all the political differences between each side to economic issues, the case of private property makes for a very generalize-able example.
I have no doubt that, in practice, many right-wing Mormons do indeed vote Republican because they are against the redistribution of wealth. I have no doubt that there is some selfishness at play here. I’m also convinced that many right-wing Mormons are against it because they honestly believe that a free market wherein the individual rights to private property are strongly enforced are either better for society overall, or simply the morally right social arrangement. None of these reasons account for the harmony that I see between conservatism and Mormonism.
The reason why Mormons ought to be against the compensation of property by the state for the sake of redistribution is because that property belongs to the Lord and His kingdom to which we have consecrated it. Right-wing Mormons want to limit the secular state as much as possible since that state is not the sovereign in which they have placed their faith. It is the church and not the state that Mormons think ought to redistribute property. In other words, right-wing Mormons ought not to privilege their individual rights, but those of the Lord and His kingdom over the state.
While this is clearly a criticism of some left-wing claims, I think this also functions as a badly needed criticism of many right-wing claims from within the church membership. To the extent that they presuppose and endorse the individualism of capitalism and classical liberalism they also depart from the collectivism of Mormonism to that same extent. Of course the individualism of capitalism, while not ideal, is still much more harmonious with the voluntary collectivism of the church than the compulsory collectivism of the state ever could be, practically speaking.